Makes clean shutdown with systemd actually work.
I've also made superqemu version a SemVer thing so that we don't need to bump it as often, only on a major or minor bump.
Using systemd's `Delegate=` option, it is possible to get it to let you manage your own cgroup subtree, therefore allowing you to set options and other fun stuff.
This commit adds support for doing so and configuring the resource limits in config.toml.
For later: The cgroup created has to be a threaded one. Iin theory, we can actually wait for the QEMU process to handshake qmp, grab the vCPU threads, and only limit those. For now, just limiting the entire QEMU process works, though and is the least complicated.
NOTE: Windows support should still work, even if you have resource limits configured. If you do, it should only warn and complain, but still function.
This reverts commit 199924ff92.
nvm the decade old shitcode webapp that people seem to still flock to for NO reason breaks
honestly why do we even support that hunk of trash it's a decade old, falling apart, and all it does
is stifle progress if anything
Seems to fix or at least make a pretty bad memory leak much slower.
I hate ws but the only other library is written by someone who isn't
a very nice person (putting it on the nice side)
Work on abstracting the CollabVMServer so it now calls into a interface for sending/recieving protocol messages. This will allow cleaner bringup of a fully binary protocol, and generally is just cleaner code.
Mostly everything is parsd/running through this new layer, although there are some TODO items:
- NetworkClient/... should just spit out a Buffer or something that eventually turns into or has one
- TCP protocol will need to be revamped so we can support an actual binary protocol on top of it. The current thing is line based
- More admin op stuff needs to be handled
- The handlers are a bit jumbled around atm
- There is still a good amount of code which assumes guacamole which needs to be rewritten
dont use this branch fuckers
- moved superqemu's "QemuDisplay" here; the VNC VM and Qemu both share it (and it has been renamed to a less goofy dumb name)
- VNC VM has been heavily refactored to just use the VNC display we have (this means only one source of truth, less bugs, and it's generally just Better to share the code imho). this means that future plans to abstract this further (or implement the client in cvm-rs in general) won't cause any explosions, or require duplicate effort
- vms are now in src/vm/... just better organization
- superqemu doesn't manage a display anymore (or care about it, other than making sure the socket is unlinked on stop). Instead now it provides info for us to setup our own VNC client. This is also why we provide our own shim interface
This currently relies on a alpha version of superqemu.
Before this is merged into cvmts main I will publish a stable tag and point cvmts to that new version
i think this was causing it to not be freed because we were holding a live reference (to NAPI/node/v8 side of things) even after we were done so the input buffer just never got freed from the buffer pool
- switch to napi-rs. this mostly affects only the backend side of things, but IMO napi-rs is better (also, way less boilerplate is needed compared to neon).
- jpeg encoding no longer clones the input buffer internally (or wraps it in a Mutex as well), thanks to napi-rs not sucking in this regard. this is *probably* a micro-optimization, but will make it easier to later on do parallel encoding of all rectangles
- guac encoding is weird. This is kind of a painpoint of napi-rs but it's bearable
Much less underhanded than using an IO library's capability to do so. Also, rayon will make encoding multiple jpegs in parallel *much* easier.
tbh if i do that I may also switch to napi-rs, it seems a bit less painful and supports much more async shenigans.
(Also, it will actually bind classes properly... something Neon really sucks at unless you look at strange documentation.)
both superqemu and vncvm have supported this but I never did it for some reason. its noticably faster than before. testing seems to imply that its actually slightly faster without the batcher enabled (maybe because it's actually able to split the work now if I had to guess)
